Strengths based leadership pdf free download

And how can you use your own talents and strengths to be the most effective and supportive parent possible? Strengths Based Parenting addresses these and other questions on parents' minds. But unlike many parenting books, Strengths Based Parenting focuses on identifying and understanding what your children are naturally good at and where they thrive -- not on their weaknesses.

The book also helps you uncover your own innate talents and effectively apply them to your individual parenting style. You'll find stories, examples and practical advice as well as a strengths assessment access code for parents and one for kids, so you can take the first step to discovering your innate talents and those of your children.

Grounded in decades of Gallup research on strengths psychology -- as highlighted in Gallup's StrengthsFinder 2. Explains how to identify and maximize sales talent, outlines the basic steps of the selling process, and includes an access code to an online assessment test. This is the first practical guide for nurses on how to incorporate the knowledge, skills, and tools of Strength-Based Nursing Care SBC into everyday practice.

The text, based on a model developed by the McGill University Nursing Program, signifies a paradigm shift from a deficit-based model to one that focuses on individual, family, and community strengths as a cornerstone of effective nursing care.

The book develops the theoretical foundations underlying SBC, promotes the acquisition of fundamental skills needed for SBC practice, and offers specific strategies, techniques, and tools for identifying strengths and harnessing them to facilitate healing and health.

The testimony of 46 nurses demonstrates how SBC can be effectively used in multiple settings across the lifespan. Helps aspiring college students discover where their strengths truly lie and how to develop them to reach their full potential at school and later in the real world.

We are now living in the most demanding and perplexing times that leaders have ever faced. Because contemporary culture is changing, new methodology and practices are needed to better inspire, educate and train new and emerging leaders of the 21st century. Many leaders need direction as to which core leadership competencies and qualities are central to their development and effectiveness in our changing postmodern world.

This book identifies the core competencies effective leaders employ and explores which of the competencies are catalytic in the development and future training of a new kind of leader. Leadership Alive is research-based and founded upon interviews with 20 national Christian leaders from the East Coast to the Pacific Rim.

You're constantly challenged to grow your business, increase productivity, and improve quality—all while reducing or keeping budgets flat. So what's a manager to do? You've streamlined processes. You've restructured. You've tried everything. Now, try something that works. You've streamlined processes. You've restructured. You've tried everything. Now, try something that works. Profit from the Positive is a practical, groundbreaking guide for business leaders, managers, executive coaches, and human resource professionals.

Whether you lead three employees or 3,, this book shows you how to increase productivity, collaboration, and profitability using the simple yet powerful tools from the new field of Positive Psychology. Featuring case studies of some of the most forward-thinking and successful companies today—Google, Zappos, and Amazon, to name a few—Profit from the Positive provides over two dozen evidence-based tools you can apply immediately.

Learn how to: Set habits, not just goals Recognize the Achoo! And this was not just because it was about his personal life - Davies was also widely known for helping everyone at Standard Chartered put their family first. One longtime colleague described how amazed he was that Davies took so much time from his busy schedule to be there for him during a personal crisis.

Davies' candor extended to what he described as "courageous conversations;' or more difficult topics. By his own admission, Davies could be very direct at times and described his style as having an "iron fist and velvet glove:' Davies also applied this frankness to describing his own personality and shortcomings. He took ownership for his mistakes, and he talked freely about what went wrong. As a result of Davies' extraordinary openness, Standard Chartered's employees could see how much he loved the bank, and they knew that his heart was in the right place.

This created a culture in which employees took ownership over their work instead of passing along blame. It also led to an unprecedented level of trust in their CEO, as they continued to give Davies latitude when he bucked the conventional wisdom. He built trust through relationships. In , when we sat down to talk with Mervyn Davies in his London offices, he had just moved on from the CEO position to one of a non-executive chairman of Standard Chartered Bank.

At the time of our interview, banks around the world were in a state of crisis. Almost every major financial institution was facing substantial losses. But as The New York Times and The Economist described, Mervyn Davies had set Standard Chartered up to be about the only bank in the world that was able to grow through one of the more difficult economic periods in recent history.

It was one of the few shining gems in the financial services sector. When Davies began to describe the reasons why Standard Chartered had thrived in this market, his jovial tone turned serious. As he spoke of the "real soul" and "wonderful story" of this ISO-year-old bank that originated in Calcutta, the passion in his voice turned his fair skin a few shades of red. Davies went on to describe how he had "bet his career" early on by focusing on two key things - people and corporate social responsibility - even though many shareholders couldn't have cared less about either one at the time.

So we asked him more about himself on a personal level. As he began to describe his own personality, you could tell that he was exceptionally comfortable in his own skin. In a matter-of-fact tone, he described how, as a leader, you must "know yourself, know the people around you, and then get on with if' As simple as this may sound, Davies reported that the way he empowered people at times raised red flags.

Early on, when he delegated responsibility to employees who had the right strengths and gave them free rein, others worried that he did not have enough personal involvement in key activities. But placing trust in others to deal with areas in which they had competence freed Davies to spend the majority of his time developing talent and coaching future leaders.

Davies described why he opted to use Strengths Finder and a strengths-based approach throughout Standard Chartered as part of his plans for developing people. Davies then concluded with what could be one of the most succinct summaries of the strengths approach that weve ever heard: "If you focus on people's weaknesses, they lose confidence:' It is clear from the bank's financial results that Davies was able to create a culture that engaged people's strengths on a daily basis.

But one of the most telling parts of our interview was when Davies talked about the pride he takes from watching other people learn and grow. Davies then took on a more personal tone, describing how he had both of his children take Strengths Finder and how differently he had developed each of them based on their natural strengths.

It was easy to hear the passion in Davies' thick Welsh accent when he spoke of the young people he has had a chance to mentor. When we asked him to talk more about it, he replied, "I love doing that. I absolutely love it. I love listening to them and, you know, at the end of the day, I talk a lot, but I think the greatest skill you've got in management is listening:' Davies then issued a challenge to any aspiring leader.

He explained that the litmus test of a great leader is "whether they can quickly write down on a piece of paper all of the people they have developed:' If they can't, then Davies thinks those leaders might just have been in the right place at the right time - aCcidentally and not by deSign. Not only can Davies assemble a long list of the people and relationships he has invested in over his 15 years at Standard Chartered, but he also expects his people to be able to do the same.

It was clear from our conversation with Davies that he is a man who is in his element when leading people and building relationships. At one point in our discussion, Davies talked about the way people energize him even more than money.

Again, not what you might expect to hear from one of the world's most legendary banking executives. By doing things his own way, Davies not only achieved unparalleled financial results, but he also built an organization in which each of his employees could, as Davies put it, "look back on their careers and realize how much fun they had working for the bank:' At every turn, you could see Mervyn Davies' keen strength for relationship building and his relentless positivity about the future.

The building is modeled after an airport terminal with a massive connecting hub in the middle. This hub is always abuzz with conversations and employees who look like they are genuinely having fun. The environment feels more like a student union on a college campus than a Fortune company's corporate headquarters. At first glance, it is hard to figure out how it would be possible to create this kind of atmosphere, let alone in a company with , employees.

With his round face, bright eyes, and jovial smile, Anderson certainly doesn't look the part of a chief executive. It's easier to picture him teaching a high school history class than running a shareholder meeting. Very few people radiate this level of warmth and sincerity during an initial introduction. Frontline employees at Best Buy describe Anderson as one of the most approachable people they've met.

As much as Anderson's look and demeanor may not fit the conventional CEO mold, his actions and personality wander even farther off the beaten path. Yet over the last 25 years, Anderson took an unknown regional electronics store and helped make it into the largest consumer electronics retailer in America. The amazing story of his career's trajectory is only overshadowed by the organization's performance during his tenure.

If you look at Anderson's top five themes Ideation, Input, Learner, and Connectedness - Context, you might expect to find someone who was an exceptional student at a young age. But he was not. Anderson struggled and had poor grades in high school.

That is why it was such a surprise when Anderson, and his grades, began to thrive in college. Once he was free to study the topics of his choice, it opened his mind to a world of endless opportunity. At the age of 24, Anderson joined Sound of Music, a small electronics retailer in Minneapolis, as a sales associate. After a few years, he became a store manager. Anderson was then asked to join the team at its corporate office.

By , the company had changed its name to "Best Buy" and had seven stores. The retailer expanded and launched several supercenters over the next few years. By , Anderson had jOined the company's board of directors and was working very closely with the company's legendary founder, Dick Schulze. It was around this time that Anderson, Schulze, and a few others began to question the entire model on which electronics retailers operated: Almost every consumer electronics store paid its salespeople based on a commission of how much they sold.

As a result, when customers walked into almost any music or stereo shop prior to , they were mobbed by pushy salespeople trying to close a deal. What's worse, these commissioned sellers were usually hawking the display models that would put the most cash in their pockets, even though the televisions and stereos were not in stock.

When Anderson gathered a focus group of customers and asked them which major electronics retailer they trusted, he recalled how they would simply "break into laughter:' People felt less pressure walking across a used car lot in those days. One of his early cues came from the experience that grocery stores provide, where everyone is free to browse and they know that products will be in stock.

Anderson, Schulze, and team wondered if Best Buy could follow a similar model - one that they thought would be much more likely to please the average customer. But there were major obstacles in the way, from the way manufacturers and distributors operated to the expectations of the thousands of people in sales roles. Anderson and Schulze knew that a decision to follow this new model would send shockwaves through the entire industry.

But they also had a hunch that it might be the only way for their company to survive. As Anderson later described to us, "That was a breakthrough moment, and it only happened because the company was going to go out of business if we played by the rules:' So when Anderson and Schulze made the formal recommendation - that Best Buy move away from a commissioned sales model - they faced intense resistance. Even within the company, there were many skeptics. But when people challenged the idea, Anderson would remind them to "think about the next fifteen years, not the next five:' Based on this idea, Best Buy implemented a new strategy that would forever change the retail sales model.

Shortly thereafter, other consumer electronics stores and retailers in other industries followed suit. Anderson's career continued to advance during this time of transition, and he was named Best Buy's president in From the day Anderson assumed this leadership role, it was clear he wasn't going to fit anyone's preconceived notions of a top corporate executive.

Instead of conforming to the new role, this self-described "odd duck" decided to do things quite differently. While Wall Street analysts, among others, expected Anderson to take a more conventional approach as Best Buy's new president, that's not what he did. Much to their consternation, Anderson would simply disappear for weeks on end in search of new ideas.

Instead of poring through trade or business books, he read everything from Rolling Stone to historical biographies. Anderson attended non-electronics conferences in search of bigger ideas.

He brought in countless outside experts to challenge Best Buy's thinking. His Ideation, Input, and Learner themes were always at work. By Anderson's own admission, he challenged conventional wisdom to the point where it was "radically complained about by my peers:' Anderson's insatiable curiosity also led to an unconventional people-leadership approach.

He quickly surrounded himself with leaders who he knew would challenge his thinking. And he was also careful to select leaders who could effectively develop the strengths of those under their charge.

When we spoke with Anderson, he described how his most senior leaders were "wildly different" from one another. Yet they found a way to accommodate each other by placing a great deal of trust in each person's unique strengths. Anderson described how he could talk passionately in an executive meeting about his ideas for the future and turn to see that he had completely lost his CFO's attention.

And in turn, when he talked about how his gifted CFO would work through spreadsheets until at night, Anderson said, "You might as well give me hieroglyphics:' This was just one of the many partnerships Anderson formed to complement his strengths and limitations. What may be even more remarkable is the degree to which Anderson was able to stay true to his own strengths in his role as CEO.

When we asked him how he was able to provide leadership for more than , Best Buy employees, Anderson described the critical role of his self-awareness and authenticity.

While Anderson may not be a natural at working a room or chatting up a store full of frontline employees, he has developed a unique way to connect with Best Buy's employees, customers, and shareholders as he travels around the world: He simply asks great questions. While studying successful leaders like Anderson, one of the most revealing items we asked leaders to respond to was: "Please describe a time when you felt like you were 'in a zone; where time almost seemed to stand still:' Anderson told us that he feels this way almost any time he is learning something, whether it is from a person, a book, or solving a puzzle.

He said, "I find it amazing that 1 can be fifty-eight years old and seem to know less every day. The voracious learner, who reads several books each week, said that he found at least 28 books he wanted to take home that evening. We suspect that there are millions of Best Buy employees, customers, and shareholders who are glad that Brad Anderson let this lifelong curiosity run its course.

Not bad for a guy who started at the ground level and spent the next 25 years soaring with his strengths. If anyone of them had chosen to spend a lifetime trying to be "good enough" at everything, it's doubtful they would have made such an extraordinary impact. Instead, they've all been wise enough to get the right strengths on their teams, and this has set up their organizations for continuous growth.

Unfortunately, very few teams are truly optimized around their strengths. As we learned from working with the top executive team at Hampton, a U.

When we first met with Hampton President Phil Cordell, his company and leadership team appeared to be on the right track. With more than 1, locations, Hampton was expanding rapidly and had developed a strong consumer brand.

Cordell had a leadership team of extraordinarily talented individuals, each of whom possessed a deep passion about the organization and its brand. His team was innovative, creative, and had an impressive track record. Hampton was already well ahead of its competitors, but Cordell wanted to widen that lead. He also hoped to initiate a major international expansion.

Cordell realized that what got his team to that point would not be sufficient for the future, given his ambitious goals. But we also found a few potential land mines. Interestingly, the leadership team's loyalty to Cordell had a major drawback.

Team members continually escalated their issues to Cordell for resolution instead of working them out among themselves. This eroded trust among colleagues, and it also meant that Cordell always had to be the one to take action, thus creating a bottleneck and slowing everything down. Unbeknownst to his team, Cordell spent the vast majority of his day in "response mode:' He had no desire to be in the middle of all these discussions, nor did he need to be.

This was not just a problem of effective delegation; the main issue was that his team members didn't have strong relationships with each other. After several discussions with Cordell, it was clear that his aggressive growth plans were going to stretch, if not break, the team.

To develop a plan and lay the foundation for international growth, Cordell would need to be absent for significant amounts of time. And the way the team was functioning, it would all but collapse if Cordell was taken out of the equation for prolonged periods. Cordell needed to build a team so strong that it would hardly skip a beat when he was gone. While some of you may be wishing that you had this kind of problem in your workplace, at Hampton, it led to a more divided than collaborative team.

After conducting in -depth interviews with each member of the team, along with looking at a composite of their StrengthsFinder results, it became clear that the team needed to build stronger relationships - and do it quickly - if it wanted to establish trust and meet its ambitious growth plans. Cordell confronted the team's problems as candidly as possible. When members began to talk openly about their challenges, Cordell bluntly said that they had miles to go in developing a "shared culture:' He described how he needed the team to feel comfortable enough to have tough discussions, which were not happening.

He called the lack of trust a "deal breaker:' The entire team then spent a great deal of time talking about how it could build stronger relationships and trust. Team members qUickly realized that they simply didn't spend enough time together; they were all getting so caught up in trying to handle day-to-day requests that they were too busy to think about the team itself, let alone the future.

They also realized that they needed much clearer expectations to maximize efficiency and avoid overlap. Even more disturbing was that most of the team members reported haVing problems balancing their workload with their family lives because the environment had become ultra-competitive. For example, Scott and Kurt, two members of the team who had a knack for building relationships, agreed to dedicate more time to helping strengthen team bonds.

Gina passionately described how she could help maximize the strengths of others, on the team and beyond, so they have clear expectations and even more room for growth. Judy decided to leverage her ability to stimulate dialogue and ideas to keep the group focused on the future.

During one group meeting, the team created "leadership brand" descriptions that detailed how they planned to leverage their strengths to help the company grow.

Soon after these initial discussions, it was clear that Hampton's leadership team was headed in a very different direction. In meetings, instead of getting defensive when Gina would ask questions, the others knew she was just satisfying her need for input.

When Judy started in with a big idea, they knew it was a part of her natural instincts, instead of an annoying challenge to the way they were used to doing things.

As a group, they agreed to discuss issues collectively before elevating anything to Cordell. In turn, Cordell committed to "knock down" problems that went to him before going through this process. Six months after these intensive discussions, the relationships, level of trust, and the leadership team as a whole were thriving. Before these conversations, the team would never have met as a group if its leader couldn't be there.

From this strong foundation, the team continued to raise the bar on its own while Cordell focused more time on the international expansion. The teams we have worked with report gaining the most from regular discussions of each person's strengths in the context of the team and its current goals. As you can see from the Hampton leadership group's experience, whether a team has been together 15 days or 15 years, each person benefits from having a basic understanding of the others' strengths.

When teams are able to use a common language of strengths, it immediately changes the conversation, creates more positive dialogue, and boosts the team's overall engagement. Gallup has been studying leadership teams for nearly four decades, and we have witnessed some telltale signs of strong, high-performing teams: 1. Conflict doesn't destroy strong teams because strong teams focus on results.

Contrary to popular belief, the most successful teams are not the ones in which team members always agree with one another. Instead, they are often characterized by healthy debate - and at times, heated arguments. Instead of becoming more isolated during tough times, these teams actually gain strength and develop cohesion. One reason great teams are able to grow through conflict is because they have a laser-like focus on results. Top teams seek out evidence and data and try to remain as objective as possible.

As a result, while people may have different views, they are united in seeking the truth. Team members can argue, but in the end, they are on the same side. In sharp contrast, failing teams tend to personalize disagreement, creating territorial divides that continue to grow. Strong teams prioritize what's best for organization and then move forward.

Members of high-performing teams are conSistently able to put what's best for the organization ahead of their own egos. And once a decision is made, these teams are remarkably quick to rally around it. One team we worked with had a long, drawn-out debate over whether they should invest in a major new idea.

After months of intense discussion, it would have been easy for John, who technically "lost" the argument, to sit back and sulk after the decision was made. Yet the exact opposite occurred. Members of strong teams are as committed to their personal lives as they are to their work. The best teams we studied seemed to live a contradiction. Some of the most productive team members work extreme hours and endure amazing levels of responsibility.

They sometimes work 60 hours a week and travel frequently. Yet they consider their lives to be in balance. They seem to have enough time to do the things they want to do with their families. As hard as they work for the company, they seem to bring the same level of energy and intensity to their family, social, and community life. When we interviewed Standard Chartered's Mervyn Davies, he told us that he takes as much pride in the amount of time he spends with his wife and two children as he does in his bank's extraordinary performance.

Davies extends this philosophy to all of his bank's employees, always encouraging them to put family first. By setting this expectation, which so many others perceive as unattainable, they attract new members who want to do the same. This high level of engagement then sets a powerful example for the entire organization. Strong teams embrace diversity. Our work with the leadership teams of some of the most innovative and successful companies in the world reveals a simple truth: Having a team composed of individuals who look at issues similarly, who have been the product of comparable educational backgrounds, and who have experiences with similar track records and approaches is not a sound basis for success.

Earlier, we outlined why leadership teams need a diversity of strengths - ideally, including individuals who demonstrate a balance of strengths in different leadership dimensions. But diversity goes well beyond team strengths.

We have also discovered that the most engaged teams welcome diversity of age, gender, and race, while disengaged teams may do the opposite. So whereas a disengaged employee is more likely to quit his job if he has a supervisor of another race, an engaged employee is less likely to leave under the same circumstances.

The main reason for that is because it contains practical advice regarding leadership. After the summary section, we will analyze the book and then we will have a small pop-quiz, where the readers will have the opportunity to test their knowledge about the book. After the quiz, we will conclude this summary with a brief review of the book. In Strengths Based Leadership , you will get an analysis of the book. In Strengths Based Leadership , you will get some fun multiple choice quizzes, along with answers to help you learn about the book.

Get a copy, and learn everything about Strengths Based Leadership. Organized around 15 core responsibilities, it tackles issues such as ethics, communications, training, evaluations, empowerment and problem-oriented policing- uniquely combining the human factor with the performance edge.

Along with this new design come two entirely new chapters: Happiness and Willpower. All of the chapters have been updated with new trends, facts, and exercises. Popular Books. Fear No Evil by James Patterson. We cannot guarantee that Strengths Based Leadership book is available in the library, click Get Book button to download or read online books.

Join over Two leadership consultants identify three keys to being a more effective leader: knowing your strengths and investing in others' strengths, getting people with the right strengths on your team, and understanding and meeting the four basic needs of those who look to you for leadership. An updated version of the StrengthsFinder program developed by Gallup experts to help readers discover their distinct talents and strengths and how they can be translated into personal and career successes.

Positive organizational psychology, with its focus on the identification and development of strengths, is a natural ally to executive development and leadership coaching. However, this approach is only just beginning to come to the attention of organizations and consequently, the research base for strength-based coaching is in its early stages. How can you discover your children's unique talents?